the military historian Russell Weigley in his book-has come to refer to a As with all generalizations, this view of the American way of war has always. Weigley’s analyses and interpretations are searching, competent, and useful. The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and Policy. Serious study of the American approach to waging war began in the early s with the publication of Russell Weigley’s The American Way of War: A History of.
|Published (Last):||19 February 2012|
|PDF File Size:||20.96 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.17 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A Better American Way of War | The National Interest
The Army’s Way of War Harvard University Press, I argue that it is less the wars themselves than how military officers perceive their “lessons” that creates a “way of war. One of the most compelling arguments came from historian Russell Frank Weigley. There is a new generation of complaint about the way we fight. Army counterinsurgency operations and doctrine provides the best overview of the “alternative” way of unconventional war.
In part, America still thf because it has not been completely stupid in how it uses military force.
Close mobile search navigation Article navigation. In the past few years scholars have proposed a number of alternative explanations for the American Way of War. Gaffney, or others—is a vibrant and evolving discussion about current and future U. That prompted another round of soul-searching.
Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves. The American Way of War: Antulio Wfigley, a scholar at the U. Popular Culture and the Globalizing of s America.
A Better American Way of War
The American Way of War Debate: These and other alternative If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in. Sign in via your Institution Sign maerican. That creates a diversity of commitments for our armed forces, requiring a multiplicity of tasks from strategic deterrence to military assistance in many places, under varying conditions.
Email alerts New issue alert. Citing articles via Google Scholar. Mahnken’s Technology and the American Way of War since Columbia University Press, explores how the services have adopted and employed those weapons that best suit their institutional prerogatives. The following is by no means a complete list, but it does provide a sampling of some of the approaches.
Jay Luvaas; Russell F. View freely available titles: This caveat aside, the categories may serve as a starting point for further discussion on the American Way of War debate.
View the discussion thread. For example, the difference between culturalists and policy advocates is often one of degree and emphasis: But continue Googling, and you will soon stumble into a controversial and often acrimonious debate that has little to do with Weigley’s thesis. With much oversimplification, this essay attempts a broad categorization of four of the more prominent interpretations of the American Way of Amerjcan advanced by either military historians or by analysts who make extensive use of history.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing wag. Sign In Forgot password? Thereafter, and in some cases regardless of political objectives, American military leaders attempted to shatter the enemy’s military forces on the battlefield. Everybody was looking for somebody to blame. If senior American military historians have difficulty understanding this hijacking of “their American Way of War,” then other scholars amerifan be completely at a loss.
And strategists are always eager to understand our way of war—especially when it seems to have failed us. His book The American Amsrican of War: The Wars of the United States.
The historian blamed our history. He posited that a decisive change from a strategy of wayy to one of pf occurred during the Civil War. That is an essential insight for understanding the American way of war. Related articles in Google Scholar. Project MUSE Mission Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide.
Then the Pentagon struck out in the postwar occupation of Iraq and bogged down in Afghanistan. Article PDF first page preview.
Historians of my generation will be gratified to know that at least as of today the number one Google entry for the term is Russell F.
Weigley’s book that first popularized it. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. Following the Civil War, Weigley concluded, wwigley grew addicted to a style of conflict that demanded massive resources, overwhelming force, superior technology, a dash of hubris and decisive, complete victory.
Among those who define themselves entirely as military historians the debate over the American Way of War is largely confined to a discussion over qmerican demerits and merits of the late Professor Weigley’s thesis.
In The Echo of Battle: Without cookies your experience may not be seamless. Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. And, to understand why we battle the way we do, we must look at the decisions political and military leaders have made—not some ephemeral spell that forced them to fight one way or another.
Fred Kagan’s Finding the Target: Don’t already have an Oxford Academic account?