In his book, I am You, Daniel Kolak offers yet another radical theory of personal identity: There is only one person, and that person is all of us. Daniel Kolak (born in Zagreb, Croatia) is a Croatian-American philosopher who works In his groundbreaking I Am You: the Metaphysical Foundations for Global Ethics, he writes: “The central thesis of I Am You – that we are all the same . Pris: kr. Inbunden, Skickas inom vardagar. Köp I Am You av Daniel Kolak på
|Published (Last):||17 January 2014|
|PDF File Size:||6.77 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.69 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Since Parfit holds that what matters in survival consists in psychological continuity and connectedness, it seems he should agree that a catastrophic psychological disruption involving, say, near-total memory loss and radical personality change, is tantamount to death. Human beings started mythologizing their pasts and dreaming about their personal futures to an extent not seen in any other species.
The Parfit on Mars, who has good prospects, has become the Main Line. That includes all theories of persons as substantial entities, whether biological organisms, or important parts of the human anatomy such as brains or hemispheres, or immaterial substances such as the soul.
Moreover, I show that this is the best explanation of who we are for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is that it provides the metaphysical foundations for global ethics. You may still fear dying, of course, but dying is not as bad as living and suffering uselessly for years in an institution. There is at least one coherent and plausible example of a single person who has two spatially separated bodies at the same time. Our thoughts about ourselves in the future, especially, are highly motivational, a fact which has helped to propel us to the position of the most powerful species, the alpha species, on this planet.
I Am You People who think deeply about the puzzle cases of personal identity have come up with a variety of bold and radical responses. Our borders do not signify boundaries between persons. Its logic does not prohibit two distinct entities from sharing the same space at the same time, during one phase of their existence.
Letting the Nullteilig Out of Klein’s Bottle.
Like Alexander hacking through the Gordian knot, Parfit wielded an analytical scalpel to divide personal identity from what matters in personal survival kolka, reaching the conclusion that ordinary survival is about as bad as being destroyed and replaced by a replica.
Presumably, at that moment he could look forward simultaneously to more than one personal future: Kolak rejects the kplak that the experience of control over a single body FEC excludes the possibility that we are all the same person on the grounds that:. But I picked it up again a few weeks later, because I knew Kolak sincerely believed he was on to something, and I wanted to see if I could make sense of it.
According to Parfit, Shoemaker and others who hold a psychological view…the having of different memories, different streams of consciousness, and so on, are of such metaphysical significance they necessitate our koak along them boundaries between persons. Evolution has predisposed us to feel the emotions of self-concern, including dread of suffering, towards persons we imagine in the future, whom we take to be ourselves.
Returns are shipped at the customer’s risk.
I Am You: A Philosophical Explanation of the Possibility That We Are All the Same Person
From a Metaphysical and Metapsychological Point of View. Grand Eagle Retail is the ideal place for all your shopping needs!
In this book I explain how this is possible. He contrasts it to two other main positions on personal identity: When I was preparing my doctoral dissertation, on which the book I Am You is based, my mentor and friend Ray Martin chastized me for speaking in the introduction about a mystical experience that by definition cannot be described or referred to which I was now referring to and going to describe differently.
Most of us dread the possibility that we ourselves will experience dementia. He reconciled this with the logic of identity by asserting that there were two persons all along. His approach implies that Open Individualism is something Kolak wants to believe.
There is no problem of injustice because your sufferings are also mine. Parfit may indeed hold this view.
Request removal from index. Please contact Customer Services and request “Return Authorisation” before you send your item back to us. We assign to them tremendous significance. Returns must be postmarked within 4 business days oklak authorisation and must be in resellable condition. There is a tree on a hill there with a little wooden bench where you can sit and see nothing of the world civilization has built, and feel connected in some ma way to nature.
I Am You by Kolak, Daniel
The central thesis of I Am You is that our borders do not signify boundaries between persons. There is still the promise of his subtitle: I,too, am not I; Idreamed the world as you, Shakespeare, dreamed your own work, and among the forms of my dream are you, who like me are many, yet no kolakk.
Kolak’s Lovers of Wisdom website was designed by former William Paterson University philosophy students. Coetzee to name his favourite novel. There ddaniel cases danuel MPD, he argues, which convincingly show the existence of distinct psychological complexes hosted by a single human being. Carter – – Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 1: I take my kids there now and we rest on the bench and always I ask them, you know what this is?
Estimated delivery business days. Fearing dementia in this way is not the same as fearing that we will die and be replaced by someone else who has dementia. There is, daiel us and them—between us and everything—an irremediable rift.
You can follow any responses to this entry dniel the RSS 2. Biscuit a golden would just pant and look around and, I swear, smile. Certainly we cannot know the particulars of life on those islands—the full inner experience of our mother or our best friend or our sweetheart or our child.
That mugger is not anybody. This is because our items are shipped from different locations. That this is startling and counterintuitive is explained by the fact that we have not, so far, had to deal with human fission. International Journal for Philosophy 13 2: